Ma'at CodexThe Truth of Source
Sign in
Practitioner Verification Program

A reference that cites a real source — or says nothing.

We build verified-knowledge tools for licensed professionals. Before any professional relies on one, we ask practitioners to verify how it behaves. We're testing the tool's discipline — never your data.

Volunteer to verify →See what we're testing
ASK

When does risk of loss pass to the buyer in a shipment contract?

Grounded

It quotes the controlling text and attaches the citation — UCC §2-509 — verbatim.

Abstains

Asked about a jurisdiction it doesn't hold, it says so plainly and offers no substitute — rather than a confident guess.

Why we ask practitioners

Most AI tools sound most confident exactly when they shouldn't.

Ours is built to do the opposite: quote a real, current source or abstain. That discipline is the entire product — and the only people who can truly stress-test it are the professionals who'd rely on it. You bring the judgment; we bring the tool. A few short, fully-supported sessions is all it takes.

Our standing assurance

This is a verification of software behavior, not of your work. No client, patient, case, or practice information is requested, collected, or expected — at any point. The knowledge base is public authority only. What you contribute is your professional judgment about the tool's answers.

Three professional verticals

What we're testing, and what we'd ask of you

Each tool shares one promise — cite a real source or abstain. What differs is the professional standard it's held to, and who's qualified to verify it.

Vertical 01 · LegalLive

Legal & Regulatory

Attorneys · Paralegals
A cited research surface over the U.S. Code, the CFR, state codes, and federal & state case law — every answer verbatim and sourced, or an honest abstention.
What you'd verify
  • It returns on-point authority, not a coincidental match
  • It abstains honestly outside the jurisdictions it holds
  • It refuses to confirm a fabricated or miscited case
What's expectedTwo or three short sessions, on a live screen-share. No preparation.
Boundary: no client or matter information is asked for or needed.
Vertical 02 · MedicalBy invitation

Clinical Reference

Physicians · Pharmacists
A drug-label and public-guideline lookup for licensed clinicians — FDA labeling (DailyMed) and public guidance, quoted and cited. A reference, never advice.
What you'd verify
  • It withholds a dose unless it also surfaces the boxed warning and contraindications
  • It refuses patient-specific and drug-interaction questions
  • Every quoted label matches its source, verbatim
What's expectedA short review of framing, safety behavior, and a co-signed evaluation set.
Boundary: no patient information or PHI — ever. Public labeling only.
Vertical 03 · AccountingLive

Accounting & Bookkeeping

CPAs · Bookkeepers
AI Accounting Pros — agents that run bookkeeping end-to-end with a CPA verifying at every gate, and tax guidance grounded in real authority.
What you'd verify
  • The human-in-the-loop gates hold — nothing posts unreviewed
  • Categorization and close discipline match professional practice
  • It flags an exception rather than guessing through it
What's expectedA few sessions walking real workflows on sample books we provide.
Boundary: your own client books are never required to evaluate the tool.
Present yourself

Volunteer to verify

If you're a licensed professional and this resonates, tell us a little about yourself. We follow up personally — there's no cost, and no obligation beyond a first look.

Please noteWe do not ask for — and you should not include — any client, patient, or case information in this form. Just enough to reach you and understand your background.
Which vertical(s) would you verify?

By volunteering you agree only to be contacted about the verification program.

A reference for licensed professionals. Not legal, medical, or tax advice, and not a medical device. No client or patient data is processed. Verification of software behavior only.